The Finance Shelf

Comparison of the Role of Financial Inclusion, Financial Technology, and Institutional Quality on the Growth of MSMEs in Indonesia and Malaysia (Journal of Economic Development and Village Building)

Research paperJournal of Economic Development and Village BuildingOctober 202620 pages30 min readDifa Ameliora Pujayanti, Fikri FikriOriginal source
Key number
80.51%
Indonesian financial inclusion index (SNLIK 2025) p.6
Largest segment
97%
Indonesian MSME workforce absorption in 2021 p.2
What changed
2.02%
Growth in Indonesian MSME units from 2017 to 2018 p.2

Summary

  • Indonesian MSMEs expanded from 62,922,617 units in 2017 to 64,194,057 units in 2018, reflecting a growth rate of 2.02%, and reached 65,465,497 units in 2019.p.2
  • In 2021, MSMEs in Indonesia absorbed around 97% of the national workforce, generated 60.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and contributed 14.4% to national exports.p.2
  • Indonesia's Financial Services Authority established strategic financial inclusion targets of 93% by 2029 and 98% by 2045.p.4
  • According to the 2025 National Survey on Financial Literacy and Inclusion (SNLIK), Indonesia's national financial inclusion index reached 80.51%.p.6
  • In Malaysia, more than 90% of the adult population holds an account at a formal financial institution, with 99% of mukim areas having access to financial services within a 10-kilometer radius.p.8
  • Malaysia's digital banking infrastructure includes five digital banks operating under the regulatory support of Bank Negara Malaysia.p.11

Key insights

  1. Comparative findings show Malaysia leads in institutional quality, financial inclusion levels, and fintech ecosystem maturity, while Indonesia faces challenges in equitable financing access and governance.p.1
  2. Despite strong contributions to national employment, Indonesian MSME growth is hampered by weak financial management and an inability to separate personal and business funds.p.2
  3. Financial literacy acts as an essential enabler for financial inclusion by allowing business actors to manage risks and utilize financial services effectively.p.3
  4. Indonesia focuses its financial inclusion agenda on onboarding unbanked populations, whereas Malaysia emphasizes optimizing the integration of digital financial services.p.8
  5. Indonesian fintech relies primarily on peer-to-peer lending platforms to bridge funding gaps for MSMEs lacking formal bank access.p.10
  6. Institutional coordination for MSME development in Malaysia is centrally structured through SME Corp Malaysia and Bank Negara Malaysia.p.12
  7. Malaysian MSMEs demonstrate higher productivity and export integration into global supply chains compared to Indonesian MSMEs, which remain largely micro-scale and domestic-market focused.p.15

Topics and entities

Summary and figures generated from the document and checked automatically: every number shown appears on the cited page. The full document is available from the publisher. Publishers can request removal.